Hezbollah is aware of the change of facts in the region, and that what was before the Al -Aqsa Flood Operation is not as after that, from the Lebanese door in particular and after the Syrian, the major changes that assume a change accompanied by the way of work, because what is required of Lebanon today is the surrender of the occupation power, disarmament and stopping the party's financing, that is, organizationally, militarily and financially.
The party does not deal with the new facts with the same mechanism and the way to deal with it previously, as it is from the moment of agreeing to the ceasefire, he decided to hand over the Lebanese state full responsibility to deter the occupation and respond to its violations, so he did not shoot one bullet, and it was cooperating to the maximum extent in the process of handing over the Lebanese army everything that he wants to receive in the South Litani region, and despite that the party was Non livré ni de l'errance israélienne, ni de la collusion interne libanaise aujourd'hui est une voie future.
Today, there is no talk except for weapons, some defect the President of the Republic, Joseph Aoun, for example, that he considers the issue of weapons in need of a Lebanese dialogue and agreed on the national security strategy, knowing that the Aoun attackers are the ones who applauded him when he uttered the speech of the department in the parliament, and the speech was clear regarding the point of referring to the national security strategy, while they attack him today for electoral reasons, quels que soient les dommages internes.
Since the beginning of his reign, the President of the Republic seeks to find solutions to the issue of weapons, he is convinced of that and teaches the Shiite duo and Hezbollah his seriousness in this matter, far from what is required by Lebanon, and from what was reported by the day before yesterday that Hezbollah has shown softness and flexibility in the issue of its weapon, in addition to many reports that have been talking about the position of Hezbollah regarding the Le problème des armes, mais selon des sources éclairées, le parti n'a pas pris position sur l'avenir pour de nombreuses raisons, dont la plus importante est que l'image ne lui est pas claire concernant la façon de traiter à cet égard et l'avenir de la région et la situation de l'occupation, mais en même temps, il est convaincu que la réalité ne peut pas continuer, mais ce qu'il souligne et cherche que ce qui traite des armes est de l'intérêt du liban.
Thus, the party's position can be shortened according to the sources, noting that it expresses flexibility about its acceptance of the principle of research in the weapon, after arranging the priorities that must be launched from the fact that the sovereignty of Lebanon is usurped and violated, and there is no priority above the priority of restoring sovereignty, i.e. the liberation of the land and deterrence of aggression, there is no flexibility regarding its delivery, knowing Que certains parlent du mécanisme de livraison, pour le parti, une stratégie de sécurité nationale ou une stratégie défensive doit être construite sur l'autorité du Liban, y compris les armes, et non la livraison et la détruire.
Tout ce qui est dit sur une décision finale pour le parti concernant son arme ne devrait pas être cru, selon les sources, notant que sa vision future n'est pas encore claire, et ce que certaines personnes commercialisent pour mettre le dossier de l'arme sur l'ordre du jour du gouvernement ne fera que contribuer à la détermination de la situation politique interne et du statut du gouvernement.
Responses (0 )